• Category:Cultists - imho it is simply useless (a part of Category:Humans)
• Category:Religious_figures - we have Category:Historical_characters and Category:Chantry members, do we really need another one for historical characters who were somehow related to the Chantry + some (but not all) Chantry members? Asherinka (talk) 14:15, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

I agree for "Cultists" (unlikely to be expanded at the moment), but I'm rather neutral for "Religious figures". It's kind of "Historical characters" and "Chantry members" combined, but it's not exactly the same since figures mean the character does not have to exist to be included such as the Maker or Fen'Harel (who doesn't have their own page anyway). --D. (talk · contr) 16:55, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

I agree for cultists but disagree for RF. As D-day mentioned, it provides a space for important pages such as the Maker, Andraste and the elven gods to fit into, which seems necessary to me. King Cousland | Talk   17:09, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

"Cultists" will eventually be deleted when links are clear. "Religious figures" will be kept. --D. (talk · contr) 04:05, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

I went through and removed the category from all relevant pages. Hope that helps. ----Isolationistmagi 05:35, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for helping. :] The category is now deleted. --D. (talk · contr) 15:18, March 24, 2012 (UTC)