Dragon Age Wiki
Advertisement
Dragon Age Wiki
Forums: Index > Game DiscussionDragon age Keep images SPOIlERS
Note: This topic has been unedited for 3529 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not continue it unless it really needs a response.

Enjoy http://dragonaging.tumblr.com/post/95176527158/da-univers-keep-dragon-age-source Star Metal Knight (talk) 11:41, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

Yay, so someone decided to break rules. I wish they were a bit bigger but still sweet to be able to look at it finally. Still good catch. Also I spy Warden appearances there. --Margerard is a Dragon Age Wiki Editor 11:47, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
Nice find Star Metal Knight! Also if you click on the images individually you can see them bigger. Xsari (talk) 13:12, August 19, 2014 (GMT)
I never look at pictures without trying to enlarge them by clicking on them, so no, it's not bigger on my side. However, I did find bigger pictures - and more - on the source given in the Tumblr post. First and second link. Oh and before anyone wondering, those weird edited faces when the heroes are browsed - the guy edited them out to "protect" the identity of whoever made these captions by not showing the unique Wardens. --Margerard is a Dragon Age Wiki Editor 12:14, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
Hmmm strange, I can see them fine on my side. Nice find with the other pics though Marge. Xsari (talk) 13:40, August 19, 2014 (GMT)

After all the hard work of keeping it a secret lol The Dread Wolf 13:01, August 19, 2014 (UTC)(talk) 12:49, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm not happy about this. 67.61.238.119 (talk) 15:30, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

It says URL not found. --Verkone (talk) 00:18, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

The tumblr user deleted the post. [1] --Kelcat (talk) 00:41, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Wow, just wow. Awesome. Truth be told I only consider these minor spoilers really, as most of the captions were too small to read and half or a third of the images I had to guess what stood for. Also it doesn't tell us how these decisions will affect gameplay, so the results some could be minor, in fact given how many choices there are I'm almost certain of it. Half of them will probably just be minor character appearances, or dialogue references. So this was pretty cool in my book, enough to give us a taste without too much detail, besides, the very nature of Keep means we were gonna get these spoilers before playing Inquisition anyway. So nice work Star Metal Knight, thanks! SenjiBen (talk) 01:00, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

If you had problems with the captions, just check the links I linked. Those are really big and there are more pictures too. --Margerard is a Dragon Age Wiki Editor 03:13, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
Heh I did check your links, but I was checking it on my phone, and the zoom quality was crap. But looking at them again now on my laptop, much better view. Thanks ;) SenjiBen (talk) 06:01, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

i wonder if this is the special announcment that they are gonna show at the end of the month either that or multiplayer if they do decide to do it still Star Metal Knight (talk) 01:14, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

This is great. Loving the artwork, too! It’s not exactly a spoiler considering how it’s only outlining things we’ve done in previous games but if I were Bioware I’d be really pissed with this leak. Interesting how some really minor aspects that wouldn't seem to make a big difference are still in there (helping the Halla, helping Zerlinda, etc.)--The Dwarven Smithy (talk) 06:08, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Ah damn! Just realized I didn't see any pictures or named tabs to do with The Golems of Amgarrak DLC. I was hoping to see some results from it's ending in DA2 but all we saw was Orsino as a Harvester which was a little out of place, but that's another matter. Here's hoping it's one of the decisions/options not revealed yet. SenjiBen (talk) 06:53, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

I imagine Golems of Amgarrak won't be mentioned in the Keep because it was the most linear piece of game content that's been made. There are no decisions, as the Warden/Warden-Commander ventures into the Deep Roads with Jerrik, rescues Brogan and destroys the Harvester in all cases. Idarak (talk) 15:57, August 20, 2014 (UTC) Idarak
True, I had considered that but, in the Witch Hunt DLC you really only make one decision, albeit a potentially important one, whether you go through the Eluvian or not. There was an image/choice for that, so I'm hoping that there'll be one like: "The Warden investigate the lost Thaig of Amgarrak?" And "The Warden ignored the lost... Etc". Especially because it's about what, Eight, nine years since the events took place, if you say it happened between Awakening and Witch Hunt, and the 'experiments' got loose. I mean all the DA games have featured the Deep Roads so far, so if Inquisition does too, I want to know if the events of Golems DLC affects it. SenjiBen (talk) 00:32, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
The devs said that the events of all the DLCs happened whether you did them or not, so since no choices were really made its a bit unnecessary to have it in the Keep. Vexed Forest (talk) 03:33, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
Ah I had forgotten about that. You're right, with no real decisions made it does seem pointless. Also that gives me hope that we will see some results or effects form all the DLCs, including GoA. SenjiBen (talk) 09:23, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

These look fantastic--but thank goodness for the DA wiki! I did my final, canon run of DA2 a couple of months ago--my fifth time completing the game--and I don't recognize some of the names and events listed. This looks like it'll be a delightfully lengthy activity, chock full of research and sudden remembrances. Can't wait. HELO (talk) 14:15, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Managed to save the pictures before they got deleted. EA's got nothing on me. Supergodzilla118 (talk) Supergodzilla118 15:10, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Wow, I'm surprised at the amount of detail they put into this, it sounds like they're covering everything. I thought they'd be writing off a lot of the side quest stuff, but I still didn't see anything about the Irregulars, the mages' collective, or D vs. K, and I wasn't expecting Ginnis to have a tile, she dies no matter what IIRC. Same with Ser Landry, wasn't she some throwaway character from the Crime Wave arc? Is she gonna show up? What about Loghain's seneschal and that one messenger in Lothering? Now I'm thinking about keeping a whole bunch of people I normally kill alive, like the Lothering bandits. Does this mean that not killing the Bone Pit High Dragon will have an effect on the game? Will it fly southwest and become an additional challenge? RShepard227 (talk) 21:28, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

It's killing me to hear all you guys talk about how detailed it is when I was too late to sneak a peak. Primary Faction (talk) 22:36, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean? The Tumbler post was removed, but Margerard's links to some pics of it still work. Check them out. SenjiBen (talk) 00:22, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Hopefully BioWare comes down hard on whoever leaked this. Such a crappy thing to do... and costly if BioWare decides to prosecude the NDA violation. I hope they won't stop inviting beta testers because of this. --Kelcat (talk) 23:45, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

I think they'll most likely sue the person for breaking the NDA (non disclosure agreement incase people don't know what it is). Don't think they can do more then that, like say ban the person from playing DAI. Think that would be impossible anyway. Xsari (talk) 1:20, August 21, 2014 (GMT)

This isn't nice at all. Someone has betrayed the trust of BioWare. Fernando Melo seemed a bit upset too. "Yes, aware of Keep leaks. Disappointed, esp fans or sites that know better but continue to share leaks... or profit in cases." I don't know if this is one of the websites that was being referenced there. Lazare326 07:09, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Well, these things happen when you have a large community and you act gatekeeper with information. The problem that face gaming industry today are many and one of them is the secrecy. Why have a closed beta instead of an open beta? I understand if you want to limit the number of users early on, but that can still be done without enforcing an NDA. Why not speak openly about game development so we can see it for ourselves? I'm reminded of a clip I saw once. [2] And besides information wants to be free. I'm not arguing that breaking the NDA is correct, however, leaks happens. And I don't know why there had to be an NDA in the first place. --Thraxian (talk) 11:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
Yes you're right, leaks are inevitable, I was just stating my opinion on this certain matter. A lot of people haven't had invites and I get why they may be desperate for information, but patience is good. This particular leak got me a bit upset. The achievements one was trivial imo. This isn't spoilerish in any way, but Melo's statements just made me think for a second. I felt sorry for what he did say. But hey, the guy kept confident, and was delighted to claim more news would come. Lazare326 12:15, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
I read his tweets now, and yeah he's seem genuinely disappointed. I just think openness is a more efficient and productive way of doing things. Personally I signed up for the keep beta as soon as I could, but still haven't gotten in. So the leaks benefit me. Of course patience is valuable for anyone. But I still feel like the lack of information and the release date on the keep and DAI keep getting pushed forward makes this type of leaks inevitable. I just want to know stuff. The more the better. Preferably from BioWare themselves. But yeah, leaks is another way. I just wish they could speak more honest and openly. --Thraxian (talk) 12:33, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement